February 2025

Audit reporting on going concern is a critical aspect of the financial statement audit process. When an auditor identifies events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, they must evaluate the adequacy of management’s disclosures and determine the appropriate modifications to the auditor’s report. This ensures that stakeholders are fully informed about potential risks affecting the entity’s financial stability. The auditor’s responsibility includes deciding whether to include an emphasis of matter paragraph, issue a qualified or adverse opinion, or disclaim an opinion if sufficient evidence cannot be obtained.… Read more

Auditing the going concern assumption is a critical aspect of the financial statement audit process. Auditors are required to evaluate whether an entity is capable of continuing its operations for at least 12 months from the balance sheet date without the need for liquidation or significant financial restructuring. This involves a series of audit procedures designed to assess management’s going concern evaluation, identify any potential risks, and ensure that appropriate disclosures are made in the financial statements.… Read more

Identifying events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern is a critical responsibility for both management and auditors. These events and conditions serve as early warning signs that an organization may face financial instability, operational challenges, or external pressures that could jeopardize its ability to meet obligations and sustain operations. Recognizing and properly addressing these indicators ensures the accuracy of financial reporting and informs stakeholders about potential risks.… Read more

The auditor plays a crucial role in evaluating management’s assessment of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. While management is primarily responsible for making this assessment, the auditor must independently evaluate its adequacy and ensure that appropriate disclosures are made in the financial statements. This involves reviewing financial data, performing audit procedures to identify any risks of material misstatement, and determining whether management’s plans to mitigate those risks are feasible.… Read more

Management’s assessment of going concern is a critical process in financial reporting, requiring an evaluation of an entity’s ability to continue its operations for the foreseeable future—typically at least 12 months from the balance sheet date. This assessment involves reviewing financial performance, operational efficiency, and external factors that may affect the organization’s viability. Management must also consider any risks or uncertainties that could threaten the entity’s ability to meet its obligations and ensure that appropriate disclosures are made if substantial doubt exists.… Read more

Management plays a critical role in assessing and maintaining an entity’s going concern status—the assumption that the organization will continue its operations for the foreseeable future without the intention or need to liquidate or cease trading. This responsibility extends to the preparation of financial statements, ensuring that they accurately reflect the entity’s financial health and include appropriate disclosures if there is substantial doubt about the ability to continue as a going concern.… Read more

The concept of going concern is fundamental in accounting and auditing, referring to an entity’s ability to continue its operations for the foreseeable future without the intention or necessity of liquidation or ceasing operations. The going concern assumption underpins the preparation of financial statements, ensuring that assets and liabilities are recorded based on the expectation of ongoing business activity. Auditors play a crucial role in evaluating an organization’s going concern status, identifying risks that may threaten its financial stability, and ensuring appropriate disclosures are made.… Read more

Facts discovered after the financial statements have been issued can pose significant challenges for both auditors and management. These facts may reveal previously undetected errors, omissions, or misstatements, potentially affecting stakeholders’ decisions and the credibility of the organization’s financial reporting. Depending on the nature and materiality of the facts, corrective actions may be necessary, such as restating the financial statements, issuing revised auditor reports, or disclosing the errors to regulatory bodies.… Read more

Facts discovered after the date of the auditor’s report but before the issuance of the financial statements can significantly impact the audit process and the final financial reporting. These facts may indicate conditions that existed at the balance sheet date or reveal new developments that require disclosure. The discovery of such facts necessitates careful evaluation and possible revision of the financial statements or the auditor’s report to ensure they remain accurate, complete, and in compliance with relevant accounting standards.… Read more

Audit procedures to test subsequent events are vital for verifying that all significant events occurring after the balance sheet date and before the issuance of the financial statements are identified, evaluated, and properly reflected in the financial reports. These procedures help auditors determine whether subsequent events require adjustments to the financial statements or additional disclosures to ensure they present a true and fair view. Failure to appropriately test subsequent events can result in material misstatements, non-compliance with accounting standards, and erosion of stakeholder trust.… Read more