When a business acquires a fixed asset, it estimates the asset’s useful life—the period over which the asset will provide economic benefits. However, due to changes in technology, usage patterns, or maintenance conditions, businesses may need to revise the remaining expected life of an asset. This change affects future depreciation calculations and financial reporting. Below, we explore the reasons for adjusting an asset’s useful life, how to recalculate depreciation, and the accounting treatment.
In general, the useful life of an asset is initially estimated based on management’s expectations and available industry data. Under IFRS (IAS 16: Property, Plant and Equipment), the useful life must be reviewed at least annually and revised if expectations differ from previous estimates. Under US GAAP (ASC 360), management also assesses whether the remaining life of a long-lived asset still reflects its economic utility. Revising useful life is not an error correction—it is a change in accounting estimate and is accounted for prospectively.
These revisions are essential for avoiding over- or under-depreciation, ensuring that financial statements accurately reflect current operational realities. Technology evolves, asset condition changes, and usage patterns fluctuate—making useful life adjustments a normal part of responsible asset management. For industries such as aviation, telecommunications, construction, and manufacturing, this process is especially critical since asset consumption varies significantly with operational intensity.
1. Reasons for Changing the Remaining Expected Life of an Asset
The reasons behind revising an asset’s remaining life often stem from evolving circumstances within the firm or marketplace. Accounting standards emphasize that management should consider physical wear, technical obsolescence, market demand, legal restrictions, and operational insights. A change in useful life reflects the company’s best estimate of future economic benefits.
A. Technological Advancements
Rapid advancements in technology may shorten an asset’s useful life, making it obsolete sooner than expected.
Expanded insight: In industries relying on automation, robotics, and high-precision manufacturing equipment, technological cycles are short. A machine with a planned life of 10 years may become outdated within 5 if more efficient models emerge. Examples include:
- Medical equipment (MRI machines, laboratory devices)
- Telecommunications infrastructure (5G replacing older systems)
- Semiconductor manufacturing equipment
Under IAS 36, the emergence of superior technology is a potential indicator of impairment, meaning companies must reassess useful life earlier than expected.
B. Changes in Usage
If an asset is used more intensively than planned, its useful life may decrease. Conversely, reduced usage may extend its lifespan.
For example:
- A delivery truck originally planned for 15,000 km per year is now used 40,000 km per year.
- A machine moved to a lower-volume production line may last longer.
Companies with decentralized operations—such as logistics firms or factories with multiple shifts—must regularly review usage data to ensure depreciation aligns with operational reality.
C. Improved Maintenance
Regular servicing and repairs can extend an asset’s useful life beyond its original estimate.
Internal control note: Strong maintenance practices reduce breakdowns, extend asset life, and affect depreciation schedules. Organizations using ERP asset management modules often track maintenance logs to support revised estimates.
D. Changes in Business Operations
Companies may revise an asset’s useful life due to shifts in business strategy, such as downsizing or expanding operations.
For instance:
- A plant scheduled for closure may shorten asset life.
- An expansion project requiring more capacity may increase usage and reduce life.
- Strategic outsourcing may reduce wear and extend the life of certain assets.
E. Legal or Environmental Regulations
New regulations may require businesses to phase out certain assets earlier than planned.
Examples include:
- Environmental rules banning older industrial boilers
- Safety regulations requiring replacement of outdated manufacturing machinery
- New emissions standards requiring fleet upgrades
Under IFRS, regulatory changes are strong triggers for revising useful life and assessing potential impairment.
2. Accounting Treatment for Changes in Asset Life
When an asset’s remaining life is revised, the change is applied prospectively—meaning past depreciation remains unchanged, and the new estimate affects only future depreciation. This is consistent with IAS 8 (Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors), which requires prospective application for estimate changes.
Prospective adjustment prevents companies from retrospectively altering prior financial statements and ensures comparability across periods.
Formula for Adjusted Depreciation
New Annual Depreciation = (Current Book Value – Residual Value) ÷ Revised Remaining Useful Life
- Current Book Value: The asset’s value after accumulated depreciation.
- Residual Value: The estimated salvage value at the end of its life.
- Revised Remaining Useful Life: The newly estimated years of use.
Important professional note: Changes in useful life often form part of audit focus areas. Auditors will request:
- Supporting documentation for revised estimates
- Maintenance records
- Usage data (e.g., machine hours)
- Industry benchmarks
- Management justification and approval
Under US GAAP, the same prospective treatment applies. There is no restatement of prior periods. The carrying amount simply becomes the new base for depreciation.
3. Example of Changing the Expected Life of an Asset
Scenario:
- A company purchases a machine for $100,000.
- The initial estimated useful life is 10 years.
- The asset has a residual value of $10,000.
- The company uses the Straight-Line Depreciation Method.
This is a common scenario in manufacturing industries where machines may operate differently from initial expectations. The example below demonstrates how depreciation must be revised when new information arises regarding asset life.
Step 1: Calculate Original Depreciation
Annual Depreciation = (Cost – Residual Value) ÷ Useful Life
= ($100,000 – $10,000) ÷ 10
= $9,000 per year
This yearly depreciation amount remains constant for the first five years since the company uses straight-line depreciation and no changes have occurred yet.
Step 2: Determine Book Value After 5 Years
Accumulated Depreciation = 5 × $9,000 = $45,000
Book Value = Cost – Accumulated Depreciation
= $100,000 – $45,000 = $55,000
This book value is crucial for recalculating depreciation prospectively. Neither IFRS nor GAAP allows revising prior depreciation unless an error occurred.
Step 3: Change in Remaining Useful Life
The company reassesses the asset and estimates it will now last for 7 more years instead of 5.
Reasoning behind this extension:
- Maintenance may have improved asset condition.
- Production demands may have decreased.
- Technology that was expected to replace the machine may be delayed or unavailable.
Step 4: Recalculate Depreciation
New Depreciation = (Book Value – Residual Value) ÷ Revised Remaining Life
= ($55,000 – $10,000) ÷ 7
= $6,429 per year
This new yearly depreciation is lower than before because the asset will now generate economic benefits over a longer period. This adjustment affects the next seven years—nothing prior is changed.
Step 5: Journal Entry for Adjusted Depreciation
Debit: Depreciation Expense $6,429
Credit: Accumulated Depreciation $6,429
This entry reflects depreciation for the first year after the revision. The entry will be repeated annually (with the updated amount) for the remaining useful life.
4. Impact of Changing the Asset’s Useful Life
A. Balance Sheet
- The asset’s book value remains unchanged; only future depreciation changes.
- Accumulated depreciation continues to increase.
Deeper financial analysis:
- The asset remains listed at historical cost on the balance sheet (if using the Cost Model).
- Lower depreciation increases the asset’s future carrying amount compared to earlier expectations.
- No gain or loss arises from changing useful life.
B. Income Statement
- Annual depreciation expense decreases (or increases) based on the new estimate.
- Net income may improve if depreciation decreases.
For example, reducing depreciation from $9,000 to $6,429 results in a $2,571 increase in annual profit—an important factor for performance evaluations, loan covenants, and planning.
C. Cash Flow Statement
- Since depreciation is a non-cash expense, the cash flow statement is not directly affected.
However, net income changes flow into operating cash flow adjustments. Lower depreciation means a lower “add-back” in the operating section.
5. Advantages of Revising an Asset’s Useful Life
- More Accurate Financial Reporting: Ensures that depreciation reflects the asset’s actual lifespan.
- Better Decision-Making: Helps businesses manage asset replacement strategies.
- Tax Benefits: Adjusting depreciation may reduce taxable income in certain years.
Additional advantages:
- Improves reliability of budgeting for capital expenditures.
- Enhances audit transparency.
- Supports accurate performance metrics (ROA, profit margins).
6. Disadvantages of Revising an Asset’s Useful Life
- Complex Adjustments: Requires continuous asset reassessment.
- Potential Investor Concerns: Frequent changes may raise questions about asset management.
Frequent revisions, especially downward adjustments, may signal operational inefficiencies or poor planning. Auditors typically scrutinize such changes to ensure they are justified and documented.
7. When Should a Business Change the Remaining Life of an Asset?
- If the asset is used more or less than originally expected.
- When technology changes impact the asset’s viability.
- If maintenance efforts extend or shorten the asset’s lifespan.
Expanded guidance:
- Annual review of useful life is required under IAS 16.
- Major repairs or overhauls should trigger reassessment.
- Operational restructuring often changes asset consumption patterns.
Ensuring Accurate Depreciation with Asset Life Revisions
Revising the remaining expected life of an asset ensures that depreciation aligns with its actual usage. By making prospective adjustments, businesses improve financial accuracy, optimize tax planning, and enhance asset management strategies.
When managed correctly, useful life adjustments:
- Reflect realistic asset utility
- Support better long-term planning
- Reduce financial misstatements
- Meet IFRS and GAAP compliance requirements
Ultimately, this fosters more transparent reporting, improved financial decision-making, and stronger corporate governance.
✓