Auditing

Beyond standard representations regarding management’s responsibilities, auditors often require additional written representations covering specific areas of the audit. These “other written representations” serve to confirm the completeness and accuracy of information provided, particularly in areas where direct audit evidence may be limited or where management’s assertions play a critical role in financial reporting. Such representations may address areas like contingencies, related party transactions, subsequent events, and compliance with laws and regulations.… Read more

Written representations about management’s responsibilities are formal statements provided by management to auditors, confirming their role in the preparation and presentation of financial statements. These representations are critical for ensuring that management acknowledges its obligations under applicable accounting frameworks, such as the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). By obtaining these representations, auditors secure a key piece of audit evidence that supports the overall credibility of the financial reporting process.… Read more

Written representations are a critical component of the audit process, serving as formal statements provided by management to confirm the accuracy and completeness of information shared with auditors. These representations cover various aspects of the financial statements and the organization’s operations, including compliance with laws and regulations, the recognition and measurement of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent liabilities. Auditors rely on written representations as part of their overall evidence-gathering process, especially when corroborating other audit findings.… Read more

Effective communication between auditors and those charged with governance is a fundamental aspect of the audit process, particularly when it concerns going concern issues. Going concern assessments involve evaluating whether an entity can continue its operations for at least 12 months from the balance sheet date without the need for liquidation or significant restructuring. When risks or uncertainties related to going concern are identified, auditors must promptly communicate these findings to governance bodies, such as the board of directors or the audit committee.… Read more

Audit reporting on going concern is a critical aspect of the financial statement audit process. When an auditor identifies events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, they must evaluate the adequacy of management’s disclosures and determine the appropriate modifications to the auditor’s report. This ensures that stakeholders are fully informed about potential risks affecting the entity’s financial stability. The auditor’s responsibility includes deciding whether to include an emphasis of matter paragraph, issue a qualified or adverse opinion, or disclaim an opinion if sufficient evidence cannot be obtained.… Read more

Auditing the going concern assumption is a critical aspect of the financial statement audit process. Auditors are required to evaluate whether an entity is capable of continuing its operations for at least 12 months from the balance sheet date without the need for liquidation or significant financial restructuring. This involves a series of audit procedures designed to assess management’s going concern evaluation, identify any potential risks, and ensure that appropriate disclosures are made in the financial statements.… Read more

Identifying events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern is a critical responsibility for both management and auditors. These events and conditions serve as early warning signs that an organization may face financial instability, operational challenges, or external pressures that could jeopardize its ability to meet obligations and sustain operations. Recognizing and properly addressing these indicators ensures the accuracy of financial reporting and informs stakeholders about potential risks.… Read more

The auditor plays a crucial role in evaluating management’s assessment of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. While management is primarily responsible for making this assessment, the auditor must independently evaluate its adequacy and ensure that appropriate disclosures are made in the financial statements. This involves reviewing financial data, performing audit procedures to identify any risks of material misstatement, and determining whether management’s plans to mitigate those risks are feasible.… Read more

Management’s assessment of going concern is a critical process in financial reporting, requiring an evaluation of an entity’s ability to continue its operations for the foreseeable future—typically at least 12 months from the balance sheet date. This assessment involves reviewing financial performance, operational efficiency, and external factors that may affect the organization’s viability. Management must also consider any risks or uncertainties that could threaten the entity’s ability to meet its obligations and ensure that appropriate disclosures are made if substantial doubt exists.… Read more

Management plays a critical role in assessing and maintaining an entity’s going concern status—the assumption that the organization will continue its operations for the foreseeable future without the intention or need to liquidate or cease trading. This responsibility extends to the preparation of financial statements, ensuring that they accurately reflect the entity’s financial health and include appropriate disclosures if there is substantial doubt about the ability to continue as a going concern.… Read more